Our Blog

Why the Life Amendment is Needed

?In 2018, five activist judges of the Iowa Supreme Court created an unlimited “right” to abortion by striking down an Iowa law providing for a three-day reflection period before an abortion is performed.?

  • ? The Court?s decision is even more radical than Roe v. Wade, opening the door to abortion in Iowa at any time, for any reason, right up to birth. Just like New York.?
  • ? The decision means every pro-life law ever passed or that could be passed in Iowa could be declared ?unconstitutional.??
  • ? Dissenting judges worry the decision is ?a steppingstone? to making taxpayers fund abortion.?

The Iowa Legislature passed HJR5 on May 20, 2021, formerly known as the Protect Life Amendment. The now titled Life Amendment must pass the next General Assembly of the Iowa Legislature (in 2023 or 2024) and then be ratified by a vote of the people of Iowa for approval, in order to be added to the Iowa Constitution.?

This is a critical first step to return the Iowa Constitution to its original abortion-neutral status and restore the proper voice of the people of Iowa from overreaching, unelected judges.?

***Planned Parenthood is already launching an aggressive campaign?

against this Amendment.***?

 

Comment Below to SIGN THE PETITION!

 

Update on the Life Amendment (formerly Protect Life Amendment)

by??|?May 24, 2021

As I sat in the Iowa Capitol Chamber watching and listening to the Senate proceedings of the final vote to pass the Life Amendment, in the third week extension of this legislation session, I had such mixed emotions.? My heart was grateful to all the pro-life advocates and legislators who worked relentlessly and long to see this through.? I was excited for the victory we gained and wanted to scream and shout from the observation area I was in.? My heart was broken as I heard arguments in opposition to the amendment and the accusations that we are against women, which were not true.? But my primary emotion was to acknowledge I felt anxious about the future, so we do not lose the momentum valiantly fought for in 2021.? As I contemplate the thoughts swirling that day, these things I know.? I am secure in knowing the Coalition will work hard to educate Iowans about the impact of the Life Amendment.? I am assured by the prayers of those who cherish life and support the sanctity of life cause.? But mainly, I feel hope and trust.? Hope and trust in the fact our work will never be in vain and with humble hearts before God, He will hear our cry for the lives yet to be born!

Thankfully as of May 20, 2021, the Life Amendment made its way through the political process and?passed both the House and Senate! Even though there were differences in wording between the?houses, Representative Steve Holt explained that the compromise sought to make the language simple?and concise.

Our pro-life legislators worked hard and were passionate about the job before them. While abortion is an issue raised by the amendment it also deals with a broader issue of the courts making up the law. Sen. Julian Garrett, R-Indianola stated, ?You can read the Iowa Constitution over and over and over again, and you?ll never see anything about abortion.?

The proposed amendment reads:

?Life.?To defend the dignity of all human life and protect unborn children from efforts to expand abortion even to the point of birth, we the people of the State of Iowa declare that this Constitution does not recognize, grant, or secure a right to abortion or require the public funding of abortion.?

The Iowa Legislature will need to pass the proposed amendment during the 90th General Assembly (in?2023 or 2024) before it can go before Iowa voters for ratification. Proposed constitutional amendments?do not require the governor?s signature.

Iowa?s Coalition of Pro-Life Leaders, of which Iowa Right to Life is a founding member, held a joint press conference on May 19 to clarify why the amendment is so needed and to express gratitude to the Iowa Legislature for passing it.?? Speaking on behalf of the Iowa Coalition of Pro-Life Leaders at the press conference were Bob Vander Plaats, President and CEO of The FAMiLY Leader and Maggie DeWitte, Executive Director of Iowans For LIFE.? Portions of their remarks are below.

?Today marks the first step in restoring the proper voice of the people of Iowa,? commented Bob?Vander Plaats. ?In 2018, five radical, unelected judges stripped that voice away, declaring that they and they alone get to set Iowa?s abortion laws. Without constitutional grounds or any input of the people, they invented a so-called ?right? to abortion and then paved the way for future courts to force late-term abortion and taxpayer-funded abortion on Iowa. But the vast majority of Iowans don?t want to fund elective abortions nor live in a state where a baby?s life can be snuffed out just moments before her first breath,? Vander Plaats continued. ?The judges were wrong to silence Iowa voters and seize for themselves the power to rewrite the people?s constitution. Today, the Iowa Legislature was right to give Iowans our voice back.?

?The Life Amendment represents everyday Iowans telling unelected judges, ?You don?t get to just decide?the abortion debate for us,? added Maggie DeWitte, Iowans For LIFE, Executive Director. ?Because there?s one argument in the debate you didn?t take into account, one truth you can?t argue away: That little girl in her mother?s womb, she?s a baby.?

The Coalition specifically thanked the amendment?s floor managers in the respected houses?of Congress,?Representative Steven Holt?and?Senator Jake Chapman, who both also spoke at the event.

If you would like to research how your legislators voted, you can go to the following Journal entries and?find the ?yeas? and ?nays?.

Senate JournalšŸ˜•https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/publications/SJNL/current.pdf??Scroll down to page 8 of Journal? (Roll Call on page 8 and 9)

House JournalšŸ˜•https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/publications/HJNL/20210518_HJNL.pdf??Scroll down to page 27 of Journal

If you would like to join us in the fight, your financial support would be very welcome!

Iowans for Life and Iowa Right to Life Respond to Misleading Headline on Protect Life Amendment Vote

Less than 12 hours after the amendment passed in the Senate subcommittee hearing, dishonest and anonymousjournalists from WHOTV decided that deception was the best tactic to scare voters away from this crucial piece of legislation.

I hope that you will JOIN Iowa Right to Life and @Iowans For Life in our OUTRAGE over this misleading headline and DEMAND that WHOTV publicly apologize to their patrons for misleading them about the
Protect Life Amendment.Original Post Jan 2020

One Voice

I’ve made a choice for life and made a choice for death. The circumstances surrounding both situations were almost identical. What was the difference? What stopped me from keeping my appointment to have an abortion?

In truth? One voice.

When the world around me was shouting their version of the truth and telling me that a pregnancy would ruin my career and destroy relationships, declaring that a child would prevent me from achieving my goals, one voice spoke the truth.

It is easy to grow weary as we fight against this culture of death. We battle against ideologies that burden us with the unrealistic tasks of self-creation and self-love. We war against philosophies that tell us a woman’s life is of more value than the life she carries in her womb. We continually push back against the belief that the elderly, sick, or people with disabilities are of less worth. Sadly, we live in a culture that often only applies value to a life based on its net worth or capability, rather than the fact that each human, regardless of age or ability, is an image-bearer, fearfully, and wonderfully made. It seems as if we are involved in a never-ending high stakes game of “whack-a-mole,? reacting and trying to disprove every single lie that pops up and seems to dictate the truth of our culture. For those fighting against this current, it may seem futile. It may seem like the lies are louder than the truth. But, it is the seemingly small things, the diligent prayers, and stalwart faithfulness of those who know and speak the truth that will change lives.

I often think about how different my life would be if that one person hadn’t spoken of life when the world around me was calling for death. What if they had kept silent amid all the noise around me and allowed me to believe the lies? If they hadn’t told me about the value of my child’s life simply because he existed. When the world around me seemed like a torrent of hopelessness and fear, it was that one faithful voice sharing the truth in love that was a beacon of hope. Their actions and their words cast glorious light over my fear and stopped me in my tracks.

My child is grown now; he is married and is a first responder. When I pause for a moment and consider all the lives he has touched in both small and big ways, I can’t help but marvel at how just one person walking in faithfulness can change the lives of others for generations to come.

So, those of you who are on the front line, do not grow weary in your work. Every seemingly small act is changing this culture of death into a culture of life. It will happen, and it will happen one life at a time. I know from experience the power one voice can wield.

Please be that one voice.

“And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up.” Galatians 6:9

About the Author: Amanda Ladwig, speaks and writes about abortion, post-abortion healing, and sexual abuse recovery. Read more from Amanda at?www.amandaladwig.wordpress.com.

Original Post 10/4/2020

Yes, Abortion was legal in American before 1900

How long has abortion been legal in the United States?

If you know your history, you probably answered since the Supreme Court decision of Roe v. Wade in 1973.

But you probably didn?t know that abortion has been legal in this country much longer than it has been illegal.

Going back as early as the twelfth century, the English common law (and later, American state laws) permitted abortion ?before quickening? or before the mother could feel the baby?s movement (approximately 16-20 weeks of gestation).

In the mid-1700s and early 1800s, although rare, abortions before quickening were not unheard of. Dr. John B. Beck in 1817 heavily implied that abortions were primarily sought by unmarried women wanting to avoid the stigma of rearing an illegitimate child. Most married women, however, had no use for the practice. Families welcomed the gift of many children and the much-needed contributions they made to their community. Even so, Beck does not deny the fact that married women ?sometimes? wanted to avoid ?peculiarly severe labor pains, which they… previously suffered.?

Although abortion before quickening was technically legal regardless of whether a woman was married, it remained an infrequent and secret phenomenon. By the 1840s through the 1880s, however, abortion became not only much more mainstream but also most prevalent among middle and upper class married couples.

The growth of big business and the manufacturing industry created a need for businessmen and their wives to present themselves luxuriously in order to maintain the respected personas and positions they held. As a result, abortion and abortifacient pills became appealing alternatives to raising children and sacrificing an exciting materialistic lifestyle.

In 1868 English traveler, Barham Zinke explained why the middle class in America?s major cities tried to avoid children.

?The expenses and annoyances of house-keeping are in America very great; and young couples, except when they are rich? generally escape them by living in hotels. Hotel living is always according to tariff so much a week for each person. To a couple living in this way, and barely able to find the means for it, the cost of every additional child can be calculated to a dollar and is seriously felt. As long as they are without children, they may get on comfortably enough and go into society, and frequent places of amusement. But if encumbered with the expense of a family, they will have to live a far quieter and less gay life. They cannot give up their autumn excursion, they cannot give up balls, and dresses, and concerts, and carriages. Therefore, the husband and wife come to an understanding that they will have but one child, or that they will have no children at all.?

This pleasure-driven mindset provided good soil for the growing commercial market for abortifacients. Doctors sought ways to gain more patients in a very competitive medical field and newspapers were more than happy to advertise abortifacients in order to keep themselves afloat. For example, in 1845 the Boston Daily Times advertised five different brands of abortifacient pills in a single week. By 1871, Madame Restell–the era?s most infamous New York City abortionist–spent $60,000 a year on advertising alone. (For reference $60,000 in 1871 is the equivalent of approximately $1,200,000 in today?s money.) By that same year at Restell was one of approximately 200 full-time abortion and abortifacient providers in New York City alone and one of the countless others across the country.

It is important to note that not all of the abortifacient drugs actually worked and not all women who used them were actually pregnant. However, the openness of public conversation and the massive spending on abortifacients shows that abortion had become culturally accepted and highly demanded by everyday American women.

Despite the massive market for abortion and the pointedly self-serving reasons to avoid children, our pro-life forefathers were able to end legal abortion in this country for almost 100 years. It took them 60 years from the beginning of its cultural popularity to the end of nearly all legal abortions but they were in fact successful despite the cultural climate of their time.

As we find ourselves 47 years after Roe v. Wade in a culture that prefers self-pleasure over marriage and children, we should take comfort in our forefather?s success and continue to be a loud voice for the voiceless.

Stay tuned for our next article in the American Abortion History Series to find out how abortion became illegal by 1880.

About the Author: Gabriela Pariseau is a recent graduate of Christendom College where she earned a Bachelor’s Degree in History. She has contributed to?The Catholic Register?and?Students For Life of America?where she covered topics such as Christian dating, theology of the body and the pro-life movement. Gabriela currently lives with her family in Storm Lake, Iowa.

Gabriela-Pariseau

Original Post 10/13/2020

Yes, Abortion Was Legal in America Before 1900

Yes, Abortion Was Legal in America Before 1900

How long has abortion been legal in the United States?

If you know your history, you probably answered since the Supreme Court decision of Roe v. Wade in 1973.

But you probably didn?t know that abortion has been legal in this country much longer than it has been illegal.

Going back as early as the twelfth century, the English common law (and later, American state laws) permitted abortion ?before quickening? or before the mother could feel the baby?s movement (approximately 16-20 weeks of gestation).?

In the mid-1700s and early 1800s, although rare, abortions before quickening were not unheard of. Dr. John B. Beck in 1817 heavily implied that abortions were primarily sought by unmarried women wanting to avoid the stigma of rearing an illegitimate child. Most married women, however, had no use for the practice. Families welcomed the gift of many children and the much-needed contributions they made to their community. Even so, Beck does not deny the fact that married women ?sometimes? wanted to avoid ?peculiarly severe labor pains, which they… previously suffered.??

Although abortion before quickening was technically legal regardless of whether a woman was married, it remained an infrequent and secret phenomenon. By the 1840s through the 1880s, however, abortion became not only much more mainstream but also most prevalent among middle and upper class married couples.?

The growth of big business and the manufacturing industry created a need for businessmen and their wives to present themselves luxuriously in order to maintain the respected personas and positions they held. As a result, abortion and abortifacient pills became appealing alternatives to raising children and sacrificing an exciting materialistic lifestyle.

In 1868 English traveler, Barham Zinke explained why the middle class in America?s major cities tried to avoid children.?

?The expenses and annoyances of house-keeping are in America very great; and young couples, except when they are rich? generally escape them by living in hotels. Hotel living is always according to tariff so much a week for each person. To a couple living in this way, and barely able to find the means for it, the cost of every additional child can be calculated to a dollar and is seriously felt. As long as they are without children, they may get on comfortably enough and go into society, and frequent places of amusement. But if encumbered with the expense of a family, they will have to live a far quieter and less gay life. They cannot give up their autumn excursion, they cannot give up balls, and dresses, and concerts, and carriages. Therefore, the husband and wife come to an understanding that they will have but one child, or that they will have no children at all.?

This pleasure-driven mindset provided good soil for the growing commercial market for abortifacients. Doctors sought ways to gain more patients in a very competitive medical field and newspapers were more than happy to advertise abortifacients in order to keep themselves afloat. For example, in 1845 the Boston Daily Times advertised five different brands of abortifacient pills in a single week. By 1871, Madame Restell–the era?s most infamous New York City abortionist–spent $60,000 a year on advertising alone. (For reference $60,000 in 1871 is the equivalent of approximately $1,200,000 in today?s money.) By that same year at Restell was one of approximately 200 full-time abortion and abortifacient providers in New York City alone and one of the countless others across the country.?

It is important to note that not all of the abortifacient drugs actually worked and not all women who used them were actually pregnant. However, the openness of public conversation and the massive spending on abortifacients shows that abortion had become culturally accepted and highly demanded by everyday American women.?

Despite the massive market for abortion and the pointedly self-serving reasons to avoid children, our pro-life forefathers were able to end legal abortion in this country for almost 100 years. It took them 60 years from the beginning of its cultural popularity to the end of nearly all legal abortions but they were in fact successful despite the cultural climate of their time.?

As we find ourselves 47 years after Roe v. Wade in a culture that prefers self-pleasure over marriage and children, we should take comfort in our forefather?s success and continue to be a loud voice for the voiceless.?

Stay tuned for our next article in the American Abortion History Series to find out how abortion became illegal by 1880.

About the Author: Gabriela Pariseau is a recent graduate of Christendom College where she earned a Bachelor’s Degree in History. She has contributed to?The Catholic Register?and?Students For Life of America?where she covered topics such as Christian dating, theology of the body and the pro-life movement. Gabriela currently lives with her family in Storm Lake, Iowa.

Gabriela-Pariseau

One Voice

I’ve made a choice for life and made a choice for death. The circumstances surrounding both situations were almost identical. What was the difference? What stopped me from keeping my appointment to have an abortion?

In truth? One voice.

When the world around me was shouting their version of the truth and telling me that a pregnancy would ruin my career and destroy relationships, declaring that a child would prevent me from achieving my goals, one voice spoke the truth.

It is easy to grow weary as we fight against this culture of death. We battle against ideologies that burden us with the unrealistic tasks of self-creation and self-love. We war against philosophies that tell us a woman’s life is of more value than the life she carries in her womb. We continually push back against the belief that the elderly, sick, or people with disabilities are of less worth. Sadly, we live in a culture that often only applies value to a life based on its net worth or capability, rather than the fact that each human, regardless of age or ability, is an image-bearer, fearfully, and wonderfully made. It seems as if we are involved in a never-ending high stakes game of “whack-a-mole,? reacting and trying to disprove every single lie that pops up and seems to dictate the truth of our culture. For those fighting against this current, it may seem futile. It may seem like the lies are louder than the truth. But, it is the seemingly small things, the diligent prayers, and stalwart faithfulness of those who know and speak the truth that will change lives.

I often think about how different my life would be if that one person hadn’t spoken of life when the world around me was calling for death. What if they had kept silent amid all the noise around me and allowed me to believe the lies? If they hadn’t told me about the value of my child’s life simply because he existed. When the world around me seemed like a torrent of hopelessness and fear, it was that one faithful voice sharing the truth in love that was a beacon of hope. Their actions and their words cast glorious light over my fear and stopped me in my tracks.

My child is grown now; he is married and is a first responder. When I pause for a moment and consider all the lives he has touched in both small and big ways, I can’t help but marvel at how just one person walking in faithfulness can change the lives of others for generations to come.

So, those of you who are on the front line, do not grow weary in your work. Every seemingly small act is changing this culture of death into a culture of life. It will happen, and it will happen one life at a time. I know from experience the power one voice can wield.

Please be that one voice.

“And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up.” Galatians 6:9

About the Author: Amanda Ladwig, speaks and writes about abortion, post-abortion healing, and sexual abuse recovery. Read more from Amanda at?www.amandaladwig.wordpress.com.

Caitlyn Dixson testifies at Public Hearing on Protect Life Amendment

Tonight at the Iowa Statehouse there was a public hearing on the Protect Life Amendment (SJR 2001/HJR 2004). Among those who spoke, was Caitlyn Dixson, Iowa Right to Life Executive Director. Her remarks are shared below:

I?m Caitlyn Dixson, a Pella native and the Executive Director of Iowa Right to Life. I am proud to be with many in the pro-life movement to voice our support of the Protect Life Amendment.

I proudly join the call that we NEED an amendment to the Iowa Constitution that says Iowa does not recognize nor does it secure the right to an abortion or require the public funding of it. Let?s be clear; this is not an abortion ban. To the women listening to the comments, undecided to support or oppose the Protect Life Amendment, undecided on what is a right and what is taking the life of an innocent child, do not be scared by the pro-abortion propaganda. There is no blanket ban on abortion with this amendment. This amendment simply allows laws designed to protect to be enacted and stops the judicial branch from stomping down safety and security measures when you walk into an abortion clinic.

This amendment puts the power back in the people through their representatives. This amendment, though faced with opposition today, could and should be on the ballot at a future date, where even those that oppose it, those that are the most against it, can have the chance themselves to vote to decide its passage.

This amendment is what Iowans need. A voice, not only for themselves but for the preborn. An opportunity to amend our constitution and to put the power back in our elected legislator?s hands to create our laws.

Iowa deserves to have laws that can change and evolve to reflect the thoughts of Iowans. We have seen that the climate today is pro-life. That is evident in the bills that have made their way to the Governor?s desk where they were signed into law. It took an act of blatant judicial overreach to completely overturn the 72-hour provision within the 20-week bill, which then led directly to the overturning of the Heartbeat Bill going directly against what Iowans wanted.

There will be those that argue that this amendment will be interfering with women?s rights and is an assault to reproductive choice. Far too often, this means advancing an ideology that without the ability to access abortion, women cannot succeed. However, as a twenty-two-year-old mom that after immense pressure found herself on the table at planned parenthood and later walked out with her baby, I say proudly and I say boldly, that abortion is NOT healthcare, that women?s rights begin in the womb and that being pro-life is also being pro-science, pro-baby and pro-woman.

I urge you to pass this amendment so that Iowans can have a choice, again, so that Iowans can have a choice, they can go to their polling booth and declare that the state Constitution is not subject to unelected judges deciding the law, and so that Iowans can serve as the most important check to each branch of government. Thank you

Iowans for Life and Iowa Right to Life Respond to Misleading Headline on Protect Life Amendment Vote

Less than 12 hours after the amendment passed in the Senate subcommittee hearing, dishonest and anonymous journalists from WHOTV decided that deception was the best tactic to scare voters away from this crucial piece of legislation.

I hope that you will JOIN Iowa Right to Life and @Iowans For Life in our OUTRAGE over this misleading headline and DEMAND that WHOTV publicly apologize to their patrons for misleading them about the
Protect Life Amendment.

Caitlyn Dixson testifies before Senate subcommittee on Life Amendment

Yesterday at the Iowa Statehouse, SJR 9, was passed out of the Iowa Senate subcommittee 2 – 1 and is now heading to a full committee vote. Among those who spoke, was Caitlyn Dixson, Iowa Right to Life executive director. Her remarks are shared below.

My name is Caitlyn Dixson and I am the Executive Director of Iowa Right to Life. I?m here today to voice our support of Senate Joint Resolution 9.

 

?All men are, by nature, free and equal, and have certain inalienable rights ? among which are those of enjoying and defending life?? which is directly from Article I, Section I of the Iowa Constitution. It?s interesting to me that a document which starts by speaking about a person?s inalienable right to life also includes an unwritten ?fundamental right to abortion?.

 

SJR 9 is a piece of legislation we shouldn?t need but do. It is a bill that gives the power of lawmaking back to the people of Iowa through their elected representatives in the legislature, instead of in the hands of unelected, activist judges. It reinforces the system of checks and balances between the three branches, the entire foundation on which the United States government was built.

 

Iowa deserves to have laws that are able to change and evolve over time to reflect the thoughts of Iowans. The climate in Iowa today is pro-life. You can see that in the adoption of the Heartbeat Bill last year, eventually making its way to the Governor?s desk where it was signed into law. It took an act of blatant judicial overreach to overturn the law, going directly against what Iowans want.

 

Not supporting SJR 9 would be telling people like me, that our views don?t matter. As a mother, I hold close the call in our Constitution, the call to defend life. At sixteen years old, I was on the table at an abortion clinic where I was shown an ultrasound image of my son?s head. I have been questioned why I did not choose to have an abortion, and I have stood by my decision every single day. I have heard the talking points that women should not be held down by pregnancy, but I stand here and know that this is scare tactic employed. It couldn?t be farther from the truth. We should not scare women into choosing life, and we must not allow them to be scared into abortion because we say that children will never empower you, but it did for me.

 

I chose life then, I choose life now, I will continue choosing life, and I ask that you do the same. Thank you.